'Never go back' has always been a useful motto - as well as a statement of the obvious given the inexorable passage of time.
So why am I disregarding it and returning to my old lecturing job at Leeds Met? Well, I do so a bit chastened, but with some relief. I also do so humbly, knowing there were some good candidates in the running.
I've had a mixed time since leaving full-time employment almost two years ago. 2009 was a difficult year that ended in disappointment (let's just say that the timing wasn't right for me at the University of Gloucestershire). 2010 has been busy and challenging (how many university lecturers work flat-out in August, including several weekends?), but the highlight was leading a summer course for high-achieving graduates studying with Johns Hopkins University.
The cash flow has been acceptable - but as a freelance you live with uncertainty and the constant threat of famine. I hope not to lose sight of my instinct to take on new challenges despite returning to the payroll.
'Not exactly a team player' was a damning but truthful comment made of me in a graduate interview I attended long ago. Despite this, I value loyalty. I've continued working for Leeds Met despite 'leaving' and I'm immeasurably grateful for their loyalty to me. I value the contact with students and graduates too (another two-way street as I often find myself writing references and giving advice).
Opposite of exotic
Before the resumption, I'm taking some days' leave (holiday would be a misleading term). One of the side-effects of being married to a travel writer is the decision over holidays: we often choose not to go far.
Next week, we'll be on a small island off the north west coast of Wales, living in a house without electricity, running water, internet or even a phone signal. There are no shops, few people, no roads. Nothing. Our holiday is about the absence of things. This may sound strange, but until recent decades most of humanity has lived like this. Many of us in western societies could benefit more from the absence of things than from yet more surplus.
Gail recommends it highly. Perhaps I'll find another reason to break my 'never go back' motto.
I understand your rule, but it seems to me that you're not going back as the same person. That makes a difference.
Posted by: Karen Russell | Thursday, September 02, 2010 at 12:52 PM
Careers are a journey - and who says that has to be undertaken in a straight line? Look forward to hearing more - and lucky students at Leeds getting you back.
Posted by: Heather Yaxley | Friday, September 03, 2010 at 09:08 PM
Having spoken to a few of your graduates Richard, I think your students will be lucky to have you back.
It's a shame things didn't work out at Gloucestershire, but if the various rumours are remotely true, you made the right choice.
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=515503788 | Saturday, September 04, 2010 at 05:44 PM
Hmm, why does my name show up like that?
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=515503788 | Saturday, September 04, 2010 at 05:45 PM
Congratulations on your new job. Thank goodness you did burn your bridges.
Posted by: Soyini | Sunday, September 05, 2010 at 12:01 PM
Richard, LMU is fortunate to have more academic online PR horse power. There is not a lot about.
Endless Facebook 'solutions' tweeted and blogged is an inadequate response to a communication revolution.
Posted by: David Phillips | Monday, September 06, 2010 at 08:06 PM
Sorry things didn't work out, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't happy you we're returning to Leeds! Looking forward to having you back for lectures during my third year Richard (if you're teaching third years that is!).
Posted by: Clare Callery | Tuesday, September 07, 2010 at 11:24 PM